<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hoopwriters.com &#187; Cover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hoopwriters.com/tag/cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hoopwriters.com</link>
	<description>Writing Skill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Author says Bush Iraq Murder Cover functionally the same as Penn State, except for 67,000 times worse is the case, even if someone is talking about eight years</title>
		<link>http://www.hoopwriters.com/author-says-bush-iraq-murder-cover-functionally-the-same-as-penn-state-except-for-67000-times-worse-is-the-case-even-if-someone-is-talking-about-eight-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hoopwriters.com/author-says-bush-iraq-murder-cover-functionally-the-same-as-penn-state-except-for-67000-times-worse-is-the-case-even-if-someone-is-talking-about-eight-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 03:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English Grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[67000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[even]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[except]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functionally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[someone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hoopwriters.com/author-says-bush-iraq-murder-cover-functionally-the-same-as-penn-state-except-for-67000-times-worse-is-the-case-even-if-someone-is-talking-about-eight-years</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[0 20px 10px 0 &#8216;;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0 20px 10px 0 &#8216;; <img style="float:left;margin: src="http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2011/10/24/8921960/gI_61123_proof of guilt.jpg" /><br />
Arlington, VA (PRWEB) November 16, 2011 </p>
<p> This is a very simple proof of the fault lies in Bush&#8217;s War Start: </p>
<p> Richard Fults, author of the recently published book, the evidence of guilt: the murder in Iraq, Bush describes a very simple proof of guilt or Bush lied to start wars. This applies to Vincent Bugliosi, Charles Manson prosecutor, said that U.S. law provides that it is actually confirmed by current evidence that Bush and company song to go to war in Iraq, taking into account the actual attack, it automatically checks for the murder of 4,450 American soldiers. See Bush Crimes.net. </P>
<p> This refers to the two reasons<br />
<br /> 1) Any such evidence is lying to start a war criminal confirmed his intention to commit murder in order to avoid any legal right to self-defense, and set in motion the criminal chain of events that led to the murder intentionally.<br />
<br /> 2) the fact that the current invasion of Iraq, started deliberately killing innocent Americans, third party agents (Iraqis). (Both from Chapter 1) </p>
<p>This
<p> U. S. the law states<br />
<br /> conspirator knowingly set in motion a chain of events (groin public about the need to attack Iraq and the attack itself), that he knows will lead to an innocent third party personnel (Iraqis) do (killing American soldiers in defense of their country), the conspirator (Bush) It is criminally liable under the law. (From Chapter 1) </p>
<p>Bugliosi says
<p>
<br /> Bush invaded Iraq illegally, exists, or of course the Iraqi opposition, and his action caused Iraqis to kill American soldiers in much the same way, one that leads to gun fire a bullet that kills someone pulling the trigger .???? </P><br />
One or more
<p> heavily documented examples of Bush to start war<br />
<br /> &#8220;In October or early 2001, Bush (absolutely no evidence), he falsely counting the American public that Iraq was involved in 9 / 11 and terrorism, and soon threatened to attack us, and weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, and the fact that we absolutely need to attack to defend em. He told us quite clearly a lie, that about 17 months straight, still with a straight face, rely on us as dangerous Iraq was us. &#8220;</p>
<p> Bush attacked Iraq, 20 Mar 2003rd But just six short months later, 17 September 2003 in response to a question by asking journalists, no real evidence that Iraq is involved in 9 / 11 attacks or terrorism, Bush replied: No, we did not have evidence that Saddam Hussein was linked to ( terrorist attacks of al-Qaeda&#8217;s September eleventh. Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, admitted only a few weeks before the transfer (from the public, 2003) </a>.
<p> Bush a de facto criminal confessions<br />
<br /> &#8220;standard definitions of English words and grammar, and simple logic, Bush just admitted publicly that such proof is not Iraqi 9 / 11 terrorist involvement or ever has existed in all the basis for war, Bush deliberately start a war song, and! Then actually started with 4,450 Americans had killed his victim, said third-party innocent agent movement: .. chain of events, Bush deliberately caused the crotch of the legal definition of war, Bush is a murderer &#8220;(self-explanatory, but! ignored evidence in criminal proceedings in the public domain in 2003, a. From Bugliosi). </P><br />
The result
<p> and importance<br />
<br /> &#8220;1) This means that beginning in October 2001, Bush is no evidence or basis of the fact that Iraq had no involvement in 9 / 11 or terrorism, or any of Iraq&#8217;s intention to attack us, or by their presence or Iraq&#8217;s weapons of mass destruction ! all Iraqi weapons of mass destruction have been destroyed legs 1996th (2 units) </p>
<p> 2) Another proof of the video (YouTube link to BushCrimes.net) Data Clean Break the criminal attack on Iraq plan: written in 1996 by three U.S. neo-conservatives in Israel (complete with a false pretext for war cover for public consumption, that Iraq has threatened to attack the deliberately non-existent weapons of mass destruction: They say that the threat requires the invasion of Iraq). This plan was adopted by Bush in 1999, with its false pretext for the public. (From Chapter 1) </p>
<p> 3) The Bush knew in 1999 that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, then all the facts that were later tested in four intelligence reports in the autumn of 2002, before Bush forged or 2 messages buried in all four songs Congress on Mass weapons, and attacked Iraq. His murder unreported or uninvestigated: truth and justice Stay woefully lacking. Over the past eight years, the press, the Justice Department and Congress have decided to show his total lack of integrity, fairness, moral, legal liability, and the complete violation of their code of ethics and the oath obviously shameful cover-up crimes of his friends, Bush et al in Iraq: protection of the rich and connected to the wrong! They decided to ignore Bush is the real criminal facts and expose him to investigate. &#8220;(Public domain, and the evidence in Chapter 2) </p>
<p>New facts
<p> evidence of guilt: Election Judge<br />
<br /> &#8220;Bush&#8217;s view, widespread fraud and intimidation campaign to us about the war in Iraq. This is a real attack resulted in his massmurder. of the significant impact hypothesis criminal shocking new facts in light of the compromise in the next election (if they have been widely published), and Bush will be most Republicans are treated with universal contempt and utter blatant crime, either committed or knowingly and actively supports the 655,000 Americans and 800,000 Iraqi deaths, permanent lack of limbs, stroke, brain damage, and broken minds in Iraq: 655,000 U.S. troops dead or permanently disabled . All damage to Bush et al, is the design, completely unjustified and criminal action against Iraq affect the election, if the facts are widely distributed. &#8220;(On the evidence of guilt, Chapter 6) </p>
<p>This video was taken
<p> lyrics from the new book, the evidence of guilt: Bush Iraq murders, Richard Fults. Much more information and links to videos are available http://www.BushCrimes.net, as well as 5 lies told by Bush to start war. The book contains seven powerful and compelling legal evidence of guilt of the murder of 4,450 U.S. soldiers, Bush, and voluminous legal proof of Bush&#8217;s lies and murder. </P>
<p> Contact:<br />
<br /> Dick Fults<br />
<br /> 703 &#8211; 998-6079<br />
<br /> dickfults63 (at) gmail (dot) com </p>
<p> ###</p>
<p> clear = &#8220;all&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hoopwriters.com/author-says-bush-iraq-murder-cover-functionally-the-same-as-penn-state-except-for-67000-times-worse-is-the-case-even-if-someone-is-talking-about-eight-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

